2009 Accounts Payable Survey

Click
here for results
Main Menu
Home
Latest News
Payment Networks
Foreign Exchange
Feature Articles
Events
Publications
Blog
Accredited Suppliers
Sponsors
Site Search
Contact Us
Terms & Conditions
Career Information
About Us
About our Partners
Newsletter

Signup for our regular newsletter

Bookmark This Site
 
 
What Happens when Best Practice is Ignored?

In today’s workplace, the term “best practice” is one which tends to be thrown in along with another marketing catchphrase “fit for purpose” which can generate the kind of eye rolling irritation which gives marketeers a bad name!


In fact, there are those who on hearing the terms, dismiss them and carry on working in a manner which they feel has served them well enough in the past. Others may simply not have sufficient resources to implement the practices which management are asking them to do.

 

Three results of Bad Practice

  1. However, to ignore best practice in any environment, but especially in AP can have catastrophic consequences for the organisation.  There are three very tangible results from an organisation where the operation tends to be flexible and unstructured.  The most obvious one is that inefficient organisations cost more to run.  Financially crippling as this may be in the long run – often this area should be the least of your worries.
  2. An operation where internal controls are lax is leaving itself open to fraud.  An enterprising individual can take advantage of such an organisation with relative ease and as long as they’re not too greedy – their fraudulent activity can go unnoticed for a very long time – perhaps forever!  None of us like to think that any of our colleagues would behave in a duplicitous fashion, but the sad truth is that some of us probably already have/do.
  3. Lastly, the third most tangible effect of not adhering to a code of best practice is the existence of duplicate payments within the accounting system.  The Institute of Internal Auditors have found that duplicate payments make up between 0.5% and 0.1% of annual invoice payments.  This may not sound like a lot, but if your organisation makes £50m in annual invoice payments you are likely to be paying out £50,000 or more in duplicate payments every year.  Unfortunately many people assume that if a vendor receives payment twice for the same service/product, then he will simply return the payment – however this is seldom the case.


Quick Solutions to Common Failures


Current practice: Many people can input invoice numbers and can make changes to the Master vendor file
Best Practice: Restrict this to just one or two key personnel – preferably those who do not approve invoices


Current Practice: Issuing travel and entertainment reimbursement cheques
Best Practice: Include payment along with monthly salary


Current Practice: Petty cash box which anybody can access
Best Practice: Don’t have one


Current Practice: Urgent cheque request
Best Practice: Don’t allow rush cheques


Current Practice: A long winded paper trail of invoices and reconciliations
Best Practice: Automate the 3 way match


Current Practice: Time consuming duplicate payment retrieval
Best Practice: Implement duplicate payment prevention technology


Even if your organisation is unable to implement some of the more costly changes, even by changing just a few of the more minor ones – your organisation will see both a rise in productivity and over time – this will generate an increase to the bottom line.  However, just to throw a spanner in the works – best practice should be something which is constantly evolving.  There is no good to be gained from slavishly adhering to out-moded working methods.  As with many things in life, success depends on the ability to work within given boundaries – whilst retaining an open mind, receptive to change.